On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
as it is not included in pd-vanilla anyhow
That's not a reason for removing it.
What really eats a lot of time, is lack of comments/annotations in the code making it rather difficult to trace things down...
What would those comments tell you?If those comments are wrong or eventually went wrong by lack of updating, who would actually take the time to update those comments? What would ensure that those comments stayed right? And what's the damage caused by a wrong comment compared to no comment?
What about removing distracting stuff like unused variables, struct member prefixes and struct nesting like &x->x_obj.te_gobj.g_pd instead of just x, and stuff like that?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
