ben wrote: > ... > So that worked for getting the proper value, but the method I was using > to get the second argument (argv+1) no longer works. Presumably because > the "next" location is no longer the same. > ...
Do you mean after you copied the data? Did you try either threadargs->argv[1] or *(threadargs->argv+1) ? They should both give the value of the second argument. Martin _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev