Yes after copying.
gcc does not like either, both result in:
error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'atom_getint'
This is the old way:
intValue = atom_getint( ((gphoto_gimme_struct *)threadArgs)->argv+1 );
post("in: config value: %d", intValue);
and I tried both these:
intValue = atom_getint( *(((gphoto_gimme_struct *)threadArgs)->argv+1) );
intValue = atom_getint( ((gphoto_gimme_struct *)threadArgs)->argv[1] );
Same thing happens when I try to access the second argument from the
wrapper function, from the threadargs struct.
.b.
martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote:
ben wrote:
...
So that worked for getting the proper value, but the method I was using
to get the second argument (argv+1) no longer works. Presumably because
the "next" location is no longer the same.
...
Do you mean after you copied the data? Did you try either
threadargs->argv[1]
or
*(threadargs->argv+1)
? They should both give the value of the second argument.
Martin
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
