On 02/28/2012 10:06 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2012-02-28 16:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > Yes, I object. Like I said in the bug tracker and this thread, I think > > the offset should either remain the same or be the same as the rest. > > may i ask why? what makes "4" better than "3"?
+4 already there. +3 an incompatible change that does not fix things. .hc
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
