On 10/20/2012 11:56 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 10/20/2012 04:17 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> I'd happily ditch it if there was a drop in replacement. For example, I've >> had many students come to me with the most popular Processing<--> Pd starter >> patch, and its based on oscx. If it wasn't include, that patch would not >> work >> at all. So buggy but working is still better than not at all. > > so what is wrong with my patches? they _are_ drop-in replacements. > > if those students use PdX (with [initbang]) one could even writen [OSCroute] > wrapper.
I don't know if anything is wrong with them or not, or whether they are fully compatible or not. I can't take on the maintenance of any more libraries, so I'm not going to test them. I encourage you to take it on if you think its important. oscx is there and already included, that's my point. .hc _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
