----- Original Message ----- > From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:13 PM > Subject: Re: [PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library > > On 10/20/2012 11:56 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> On 10/20/2012 04:17 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>> >>> I'd happily ditch it if there was a drop in replacement. For > example, I've >>> had many students come to me with the most popular > Processing<--> Pd starter >>> patch, and its based on oscx. If it wasn't include, that patch > would not work >>> at all. So buggy but working is still better than not at all. >> >> so what is wrong with my patches? they _are_ drop-in replacements. >> >> if those students use PdX (with [initbang]) one could even writen > [OSCroute] >> wrapper. > > I don't know if anything is wrong with them or not, or whether they are > fully > compatible or not. I can't take on the maintenance of any more libraries, > so > I'm not going to test them. I encourage you to take it on if you think its > important. oscx is there and already included, that's my point.
Isn't he just fixing the existing library? > > .hc > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
