Does the new build script automatically create a complete and deterministic source distribution for the app bundle? Or do you still need to add and configure things 'by hand'? One conclusion from PdCon sessions about building Pd was, a source repository snapshot is not necessarily the same as a source distribution. Pd for OSX used to be a combined source / binary distribution. If the build is hard(er) to reproduce without embedded sources, I guess they should better be included like before. When this is the preferred approach for deken packages, why not for Pd.
Katja On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > It's an easy fix. > > I originally thought creating the app bundle with the full source tree files > and the compilation step .o files was a bug and not a feature. The resulting > .app is thus smaller. The app bundler script was written before the pd con > and I didn't recognize the feature when presented. > > I'd say that if Pd is easier to build, we don't need this but I'm probably > wrong. At the very least, the header directory can be named back to "src" > > On Aug 15, 2017, at 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Dan was unaware of this when reorganizing the build scripts for the > bundle, and while I'm writing this he opened an issue suggesting a > fix: > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/181 > > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
