On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:03:47PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > > On Aug 16, 2017, at 6:16 PM, Miller Puckette <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's ugly :) > > > > I'm using Dan's autotools setup to build the i386 and ia64 MacOS versions, > > and my own ad hoc system (makefile.mac) to build for PPC. > > You should be able to build a combined i386, x86_64, and ppc binary using the > auto tools setup when using the --enable-universal on a system with the 10.6 > SDK: > > ./configure --enable-universal > > At least we have that capability in place, but I've not had an old machine to > be able to fully test it. > cool, I'll give that a try. I think there still have to be 2 targets so that one can run i386 Pd on 64-bit machines. So I don't feel an urgent need to get this working rigth away.
> > I was sorry to see the capability to recompile-within-the-app disappear > > but I think the way the autotools build system works makes this much more > > awkward (you have to run 'make install' to get the file tree in a state > > where > > Pd can find its support files). > > > It should still be possible if copying in the symbolic links to the binaries > in the bin folder and leave the actual binaries in the src folder. That was > my thinking with adding a new flag to the sox-app.sh script to either create > a "fat" or "slim" app. > or better yet I can fix the source to be able to withstand the alternative layout. That will be needed when getting this all running on WIndows which as far as I know has never supported symlinks. cheers Miller > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
