On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > I changed it back from "include" to a "src" folder after Katja's issue a few > months ago, so the current master uses "src". If we do want to transition to > an a more standard "include" folder, the best way would be to place the > header in "include" and make a symlink to "src" for now. Just to make sure, > I believe we are only talking about the macOS .app bundle so using a > relative symlink shouldn't be a problem. >
This solution seems most future-proof. If the full sources would come back in a future release, API files and symlink can swap location. The layout would then be as in pre-0.48-0 with the addition of 'include' symlink to the API. If the sources will not come back, you still have the symlink for compatibility with pre-0.48.0 layout. And in the meantime, till the decision about full sources is made, at least we need not worry about where the API will be in every subsequent release. Katja > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
