> On Dec 3, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 3, 2017, at 11:46 AM, katja <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On a platform where building Pd with autotools is just a matter of >> hitting ./configure && make, the need for a 'self-replicating' binary >> package seems to be obviated indeed. Frankly I didn't know it is so >> easy, since INSTALL.txt for 0.48-0 still tells you to generate the >> configure script. Will 0.48-1 be different in this respect? > > Short form: I an be that easy, but the current pd source tarball does not > included the generated configure script. > > Long form: > > It *should* be that easy but it requires the source release to include the > generated configure script. This can be done on a developer machine using > "make dist" which generates a distribution tarball (even with the version > naming), ready to go. If configure and it's m4 stuff are included, then all > the user needs is a shell and compiler chain to build the project. That's > part of the whole point of autotools.
As a followup, here is a source tarball generated from "make dist": pd-0.48.0.tar.gz <http://docs.danomatika.com/pdbuilds/pd-0.48.0.tar.gz> It should work on Linux and macOS. We still have some things to iron out for Windows/MinGW. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
