Yeah. I find "you need to tell PD where to look" make sense, but adding "and HOW it needs to look" becomes the issue.
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Julian Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > You only understand how non-intuitive current [declare] is once you've > attempted to describe it simply to a roomful of learners. > Not saying current situation isn't a huge improvement over where we were > umpteen years ago but if there's the option to make it even simpler & more > straightforward plus portable - yes please. > > J. > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 11:42, Dan Wilcox <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Actually, that's not a bad idea at the expense of a little more searching. > [declare] then behaves more like the lua loader which searches for both > binary and script modules, which I find relatively easy to use. I don't think > this would break existing patches and would also honor the relative path > restrictions for self contained projects, where specifying a relative path > starting with ./ or ../ only searches locally. > >> On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:00 PM, [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:42:00 +0200 >> From: Antoine Rousseau <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> To: pd-dev <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] declare (again) >> Message-ID: >> <CAOCG5Hx19cSDb5GkJ2onAtY8OU_XaQOZs28qXGn=8jzsi1e...@mail.gmail.com >> <mailto:CAOCG5Hx19cSDb5GkJ2onAtY8OU_XaQOZs28qXGn=8jzsi1e...@mail.gmail.com>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >>> >>> relatively easy code change >>> >> >> ... so I propose step 2 as PR #440 ! >> >> cheers -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
