Thanks! I think we needed to realize fully the implications of the recent changes, before imagining that it could be even simpler...
Antoine Rousseau http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __ http://www.metaluachahuter.com/ <http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/> Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 13:07, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> a écrit : > Also, I like that this simple, yet elegant approach does not need to > remove or override the explicit -path or -lib flags at all. I'm not sure > why we didn't think of it when I wrote the initial PR a year ago. > > On Sep 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah. I find "you need to tell PD where to look" make sense, but adding > "and HOW it needs to look" becomes the issue. > > On Sep 11, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Julian Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > You only understand how non-intuitive current [declare] is once you've > attempted to describe it simply to a roomful of learners. > Not saying current situation isn't a huge improvement over where we were > umpteen years ago but if there's the option to make it even simpler & more > straightforward plus portable - yes please. > > J. > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 11:42, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually, that's not a bad idea at the expense of a little more >> searching. [declare] then behaves more like the lua loader which searches >> for both binary and script modules, which I find relatively easy to use. I >> don't think this would break existing patches and would also honor the >> relative path restrictions for self contained projects, where specifying a >> relative path starting with ./ or ../ only searches locally. >> >> On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:42:00 +0200 >> From: Antoine Rousseau <[email protected]> >> To: pd-dev <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] declare (again) >> Message-ID: >> <CAOCG5Hx19cSDb5GkJ2onAtY8OU_XaQOZs28qXGn=8jzsi1e...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> >> relatively easy code change >> >> >> ... so I propose step 2 as PR #440 ! >> >> cheers >> >> > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
