Em qua., 14 de abr. de 2021 às 18:29, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> escreveu:
> > But one can also just ship armv6 and aarch64 and it should work for > > everybody, right? > > as said before: somebody should do some benchmarking how much gain there > is for armv7 with respect to armv8. > I don't understand because I was talking about *armv6* (Linux-armv6-32) and *aarch64* (Linux-arm64-32). You said it yourself that we should use *armv8* for the 32 bit variant (Linux-armv8-32), and *aarch64* for this other one. We're also agreeing *armv8*/Linux-armv8-32 is pointless. So I guess you mean armv8 as (Linux-arm64-32) and *aarch64*. Now, my understanding is that *aarch64* can't run anything else other than this... can it run *armv6* and *armv7*? As for benchmarking and me saying we could just ship armv6 that it'll work on armv7, I guess it makes sense to benchmark this.
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
