Em qua., 14 de abr. de 2021 às 17:16, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> escreveu:
> On 4/14/21 22:10, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > > > the arch-agnostic extensions (.pd_linux, .pd_darwin, .dll) are often > > used for i386, because in the olden days that was the only extension. > > if you happen to run a Pd<<0.40 chances are that you are using a 32bit > Pd. > > and actually, if you care for older Pd-versions, you should use > .pd_linux as the extension for Linux/amd64, as .l_amd64 is only > supported since Pd-0.49 (and we don't want to get back to that > abomination older versions of Pd would use for that platform). > I see zexy has .pd_linux for Linux/amd64 instead of .l_amd64 so I guess it's because you care :) > > mfdsf > IOhannes > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
