Wow, [clone]'s nem multichannel functionalities are quite cool and amusing indeed. I always wanted to be able to have [clone] output parallel processing - like having white noise being filtered in parallel with a filterbank and then having access to each output instead of the sum. This finally makes it happen with the '-d' flag, which is amazing! But in order to do this I have to copy a single input into a multichannel array with [pack~] and I wonder if this can be simplified by using yet a new flag where a single signal inlet~ can be distributed to all copies and a multichannel is output. Maybe not worth the hassle, but maybe it could be more significantly efficient? If it's not significantly efficient then it would be just a bit more convenient.
Em ter., 17 de jan. de 2023 às 00:24, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev < [email protected]> escreveu: > To Pd dev - > > I've pushed what I think is working support for multichannel signals. Many > objects haven't yet been adapted to deal with them, but there are enough to > at least test the concepts: lop~, send~, receive~, and (ugh) clone are > multichannel-aware, and new pack~ and unpack~ objects are provided to > combine and split signal channels. > > I've put a couple of example patches on > http://msp.ucsd.edu/tmp/multichannel-tests.tgz > ... the interplay between multichannel inlets and outlets and clone > are sometimes amusing. > > cheers > Miller > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
