Em ter., 17 de jan. de 2023 às 14:54, Miller Puckette <[email protected]> escreveu:
> The trouble with multichannel osc~ (etc.) is to figure out how to > distribute > messages setting frequency and phase, etc., to the individual copies. > not sure of the internal challenge, but I would intuitively think of a list setting frequencies in this case (might be harder in other cases). > In any case, I'd consider adding the possibility for the clone object to > take the name of a primitive object (as opposed to a subpatch) - IF it's > possible to design it well and simply. hmmm, I actually had thought about that before this multichannel thing for easilly creating a bank of oscillators, for instance. It could be a way for us to also create 'mc.' versions. > I wouldn't want to invent separate "mc~" versions of everything - that > would be a nightmare. > +1 cheers
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
