Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 12:43, William Brent <[email protected]> escreveu:
> I'm not sure if this dialog is anywhere near settled (I got lost in the > tangle of medusa-like message threads), but here's a +1 for [snake~]. > that's you, me, christof, matt and miller himself, so I guess we have a winner :) > > I like the [object~ method] convention and the unique object name fits > well in Pd vernacular to my ears. It seems like there's room to tack on > lots of helpful methods...[snake~ info] could give us the specs of a given > connection. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:58 AM Christof Ressi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In any case, I am really liking now that "snake~" feels like an object >> family >> >> Me too! It is now clear that these objects are all releated. >> >> "snake~ in", "snake~ out" >> >> Actually, I would prefer [snake~ pack] and [snake~ unpack] because for me >> the meaning of "in" and "out" is ambigious. "pack" and "unpack", on the >> other hand, are pretty obvious. >> >> Alternatively, we might just as well use [mc~ pack], [mc~ unpack], [mc~ >> split], etc. to save some keystrokes :-) >> >> Christof >> On 25.01.2023 11:48, Fede Cámara Halac wrote: >> >> Yes, join/split would be translatable, whereas translating "snake" can be >> slippery. >> I do think it is amusing, btw, and slides nicely next to sigmund~ and >> moses. >> >> In any case, I am really liking now that "snake~" feels like an object >> family, that refers to the kind of signal, >> and you can say things like "snake~ in", "snake~ out", or even "snake~ >> split", "snake~ join" , >> or further, "snake~ rotate/flip", "snake~ encode/decode" >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:49 AM Miller Puckette via Pd-dev < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> OK... now I'm hesitating between "snake~ in", "snake~ out" and "snake~ >>> tap" >>> or "join~", "split~", and "tap~"... >>> >>> Former is more colorful (and crowds the namespace less). Latter might be >>> easier for non-native English speakers to deal with? >>> >>> cheers >>> Miller >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:36:24AM +0100, Christof Ressi wrote: >>> > > Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening? >>> > Unfortunately, these are also zexy objects ;-) >>> > >>> > On 24.01.2023 11:52, Max wrote: >>> > > Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening? >>> > > when "joining" two signals, I wouldn't expect them to be running in >>> > > parallel but being mixed together. >>> > > >>> > > m. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 24.01.23 02:50, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote: >>> > > > So merging (hmm) some ideas from Fede and Dan, maybe >>> "join~/split~", and >>> > > > a new tap~ object that allows you to pick channels out >>> > > > specifically. Then >>> > > > I think for example "clone osc~" might do OK for making an >>> > > > oscillator bank - >>> > > > assuming it turns out to be practical to send message-time lists >>> to the >>> > > > frequency input. (Maybe that's someting clone should know how to >>> do >>> > > > in other >>> > > > situations too). >>> > > > >>> > > > still thinking about, for instance, "clone -" to make clones of an >>> > > > anonymous >>> > > > abstraction that you just edit into being live... >>> > > > >>> > > > cheers >>> > > > Miller >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Pd-dev mailing list >>> > > [email protected] >>> > > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev__;!!Mih3wA!HryblqiKFNOUuYK6t8PJBkK26yPJYdgDiMv_z36_t9-4PQk9SJpBcxy7Jd13FSr1fRDVtVGBQd6WsA$ >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Pd-dev mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev__;!!Mih3wA!HryblqiKFNOUuYK6t8PJBkK26yPJYdgDiMv_z36_t9-4PQk9SJpBcxy7Jd13FSr1fRDVtVGBQd6WsA$ >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pd-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Fede Camara Halac >> Composer / Programmer / Sound Artist >> fdch.ar >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing >> [email protected]https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >> > > > -- > William Brent > > “Great minds flock together” > Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century > > www.conflations.com > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
