> > My trouble with Pd64 is that it will get listed next to Pd in almost any > package manager and may be many people > opt Pd64 (thinking that is the one for 64bit cpus)
I think almost all (recent) package managers no longer offer 32bit-CPU packages?... Antoine Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 13:08, Lucas Cordiviola <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Funnily, my personal feeling is the opposite :-) > > I feel that Pd64 clearly describes Pd working with 64 bit data. > > > I myself don't have any trouble with whatever name we use as I know > perfectly well the situation. My trouble with Pd64 is that it will get > listed next to Pd in almost any package manager and may be many people > opt Pd64 (thinking that is the one for 64bit cpus) > > Pd2 is also a good one. > > > -- > > Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. > > On 07/06/2023 07:55, Antoine Rousseau wrote: > > Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 10:47, Lucas Cordiviola <[email protected]> > > a écrit : > > > > For me pd64 gives more chances of confusion than pdd or pdpd. > > > > (...) > > > > Starting with a new name of the app seems the most sane. > > > > > > Funnily, my personal feeling is the opposite :-) > > I feel that Pd64 clearly describes Pd working with 64 bit data. > > I think that confusion with 64 bit architectures will become less > > present, since nowadays most (all?) major platforms are based on 64 > > bit CPUs. So "64 bit" is just a particular taste of CPUs, as in x86_64 > > or arm64, which has no direct impact from the user's point of view. If > > you want to work with 64bit-wide data on a 32bit PPC, you just need > > Pd64-PPC32, on arm64 it will be Pd64-arm64. > > > > To me, "pdd" or "pdpd" really sound like different apps, which I find > > a bit strange (it's actually the same app, only different options). > > I quite like Pd² or even Pd2, though. > > > > > > . >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
