On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 13:47 +0100, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote: > Yep, that's what's happening to me as well - I can revert 36d7be0e > but then the test patch misbehaves.
I now also checked 0.56-0, 0.55-0, 0.54-0 and the patch misbehaves in the same way. As I see it: * 36d7be0e fixes an issue - that is old and certainly not a regression of 0.56 - at huge performance penalty * All the GOP related regressions introduced since 0.56-0 are fixed in current master and are not relying on 36d7be0e By principle of least surprise I'd vote for leaving 36d7be0e out in the upcoming minor release. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- [email protected] - the Pd developers' mailinglist https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/XZN5CLH27Y3QMLZ5FU4TK27DEI3Y3M6D/
