seems we're ready to go, here's a small set of updates for the doc branch https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2769
I just merged with master and also updated the manual version to 0.56-2 Em ter., 4 de nov. de 2025 às 11:00, Benjamin Wesch < [email protected]> escreveu: > sounds right to me, too, for sure. if it doesn't even fix a regression, > it's certainly better not to hurt performance. thanks for the tests on > this! so it better remains a challenge for 0.57. > > cheers, > ben > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2025, 14:26 Miller Puckette via Pd-dev <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> OK, I'm convinced -- reverting 36d7be0e :) >> >> M >> >> >> On 11/4/25 2:16 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: >> > On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 13:47 +0100, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote: >> >> Yep, that's what's happening to me as well - I can revert 36d7be0e >> >> but then the test patch misbehaves. >> > I now also checked 0.56-0, 0.55-0, 0.54-0 and the patch misbehaves in >> > the same way. >> > >> > As I see it: >> > >> > * 36d7be0e fixes an issue - that is old and certainly not a >> > regression of 0.56 - at huge performance penalty >> > >> > * All the GOP related regressions introduced since 0.56-0 are fixed >> > in current master and are not relying on 36d7be0e >> > >> > By principle of least surprise I'd vote for leaving 36d7be0e out in the >> > upcoming minor release. >> > >> > Roman >> > >> > >> > --- >> > [email protected] - the Pd developers' mailinglist >> > >> https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/XZN5CLH27Y3QMLZ5FU4TK27DEI3Y3M6D/ >> >> >> --- >> [email protected] - the Pd developers' mailinglist >> >> https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/SEUQYM3SC5G6YUS53VLOHZ4RIEMIRREE/ >> >> --- > [email protected] - the Pd developers' mailinglist > > https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/4JUO7GS5UOP222ES3UYZ7XH3PP2SIYAL/
--- [email protected] - the Pd developers' mailinglist https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/HEWKYGAMU5VO7NY7X6RSN76ZCTGVU7Z4/
