On 11/14/06, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14/11/2006, at 17.14, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Thomas Grill wrote: > >>> There are no plans to incorporate Miller's 0.40 into devel_0_39 >> Well, there are - but no manpower available. > > Oh sure there are would-likes for that... there are many would- > likes... But I wouldn't like calling it a plan until there is some > hint of allocated resources I think there is a difference between a would-like and a sure-would- not-ever-like. - The first is much more like a plan since it is a possible plan, where the later is a plan not to or never to. I say this, since i when i first read it, understood 'there are no plans to' as 'there are plans never to' which proved not to be the case.
I would call what you guys are talking about more of a wouldn't-it-be-cool-if, if people want it but no one intends it. I interpreted 'there are no plans to' as 'whatever, but I'm not doing it,' which sounds like what Mathieu was saying.
One could argue that a flaw in - or a mixture of - my understanding of grammar, time or aristotle.
An impressive understanding of grammar it is. I had to read this 4 times before I realized it was a complete sentence. The grammar is almost acrobatic, but correct. -Chuckk _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list