I am curious, has anyone ever vandalized the netpd patches during a jam? ~Kyle
On 6/19/07, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:33 +0200, Steffen wrote: > > > The "x.x.x"-system might be nice. How do you use it? Keep the first > > x=0 at all times as no code gets to version 1; bumb the second x when > > new features are added; bumb the last x when bugs are corrected? - > > yo, that is how i use them. but the main reason, why netpd uses it, is a > purely technical one: > patches and abstractions are shared between netpd clients. in order to > make sure, that changes made to a patch or abstraction get to the other > netpd clients as well, this versioning system was introduced. when > loading a patch with creator, the version is checked by creator and > compared with the version of the same patch on the other clients. if the > patch to be opened has a higher version number than the on the other > clients, the patch is uploaded instead of only opened, so that the patch > on the other clients is overwritten. > > > Such info one how the version numbers makes sense is nice to add in a > > README, i think. > > hm, since - as frank stated - a version number is not essential, i'd > say, it wouldn't do it into the readme. > > roman > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- ----- ------------ ---- ----- ---- -------- - ------ http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
