Hallo, Thomas Mayer hat gesagt: // Thomas Mayer wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > > To satisfy the other two percent, a better solution IMO would be to > > make a pd-nogui patckage, that would conflict with the normal Pd > > package, so that only one can be installed. This has predecessors in > > the various flavours of vi(m) and emacs that can be chosen on Debian. > > How about splitting it into two packages, pd-nogui.deb and pd.deb, so pd > would depend on pd-nogui.deb. It's like installing (e.g.) gvim, which > depends on vim-common, that contains a console version of vim.
No, vim-common does not contain the console version of vim. vim-common only holds the data shared by all vim packages, like help-files. The actual binaries of vim are in the packages called vim, vim-gtk, vim-tiny, vim-python etc. Among these, the package "vim" provides a vim binary with the most standard feature set. The other packages are for people who "need more (or less)". That could be a useful solution for Pd as well, however I'd rather see work being done on splitting off a package of just the externals from pd-extended than bothering too much with making the main pd package even smaller, when those (few), who need that, can just roll their own. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list