On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Miller Puckette wrote:
It's lame, but the idea behind the original design of "pack/unpack" was to have the argument lists look the same. So, to send a variety of (known-type) data down a send/receive channel or whatnot, one could use "pack tea for 2" and a corresponding "unpack tea for 2".
error: pack: tea: bad typecould you please use an example that actually does not cause an error in your own pd?
There's no way to use "tea" and "for" as being default values in that context.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
