On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Miller Puckette wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:12:31PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
There's no way to use "tea" and "for" as being default values in that
context.
Sure enough... It does not work in Pd. I checked and it still worked in
Max/FTS vintage 1993, so it's Pd at fault :)
If you implemented that, then how do you feel about the inability of
symbols "f" "s" "p" to be used as default values?
How do you determine that something like that is Pd's fault?... by
opposition to being an improvement in design compared to Max/FTS. I bet
that in your absence I could've found a bunch of people who would've
thought that this is intentional... perhaps including me.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
