Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > I think you can use [route] now for PDP, i.e. you don't need > [pdp_route].
well, [pdp_route] does something different than [route]. it is rather the functionality of [demultiplex] (which can be build with [route] however). otoh, i _think_ you need [pdp_route] if you run pdp in a separate thread, because else the sync might get confused. in short: i wouldn't trade [pdp_route] for [route]. mfgad.-sr IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list