Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote: > Actually, for those of us who insist on vanilla and do everything with > expr/expr~/fexpr~ or abstractions, is it possible to implement [z~] in > fexpr~ for a delay larger than its vector size? You could do it with > an abstraction using [delwrite~] and [delread~], setting the [block~] > to 1, and then set the delay as a ratio to the [samplerate~] -- the > difficulty in making it work correctly here is setting the size of the > [delwrite~] efficiently (this could maybe be done with a loadbang > routine that would send a message to a subpatch in the abstraction > instance to add and connect a delwrite~ with the proper delay > allocation...).
You don't need to set the block~-size to 1, and personally I would just make the delwrite~ "big enough". It's cheap to store things in a delay. But anyway, attached is a z~-clone with delwrite~/delread~ that uses a helper abstraction created dynamically. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
zelwrite~.pd
Description: application/puredata
zel~-help.pd
Description: application/puredata
zel~.pd
Description: application/puredata
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
