Miller Puckette wrote: > OMG, is it really true that pow and pow~ are reversed from each other in > Max (and hence cyclone)!? That's genuinely strange - and if it's true, I'd > definitely make pow~ act as the present pow (left inlet raiesed to right inlet > as a power) and just print out a warning for a year or two.
in max (4.6) you get [6\ | [pow 2] | [36\ and [sig~ 6] | [pow~ 2] | [snapshot~] | [64\ marius. > > cheers > M > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:57:59AM -0400, marius schebella wrote: >> Frank Barknecht wrote: >>> Hallo, >>> >>> another point to take into account are arguments: What should "pow 2" >>> output? >> do you mean [pow 2] or [pow~ 2]? because pow 2 already outputs the >> square, I think pow~ should behave the same, also output the square >> (x^2) and not 2^x. like [+ 2] outputs x+2, *2 outputs x*2. >> no? >> marius. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list