Yeah, that was my mistake, I removed hardware/arduino.pd from the nightly builds since it shouldn't be there. Sorry about that...
.hc On Jun 14, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Max Neupert wrote: > hi list, > > i found the source of my problem here. > the patch was using the [arduino] abstraction. > i had it located in the same path than my patch (version 0.3), but > another one (version 0.4) is located in > /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/extra/hardware/ > > i've always assumed that pd searches for abstractions first in the > same directory than the patch is found. that doesn't seem to be the > case. > > for some reason pd sometimes choose to prefer the 0.4 version which > has a different, non working bitrate set. > i've deleted the abstraction and use it now in a subpatch instead, so > i am sure no other version is loaded instead. > > max > > > Am 2008-06-13 um 18:54 schrieb Claude Heiland-Allen: > >> Max Neupert wrote: >>> this is the output when it does work: >> >>> set_baudrate baudbits: 57600 >> >>> this is the output when it doesn't: >> >>> set_baudrate baudbits: 115200 >> >>> anyone has a clue what's going on? >> >> I'm guessing the baudbits has something to do with it. Maybe >> something along the connection between pd and arduino doesn't >> support the higher speed. >> >> Never used arduino or any other serial devices though. >> >> >> Claude >> -- >> http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list