my question:wouldn't it make sense if Pd would search first in the same directory as the patch is for abstractions?
m. Am 2008-06-14 um 23:05 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
Yeah, that was my mistake, I removed hardware/arduino.pd from the nightly builds since it shouldn't be there. Sorry about that....hc On Jun 14, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Max Neupert wrote:hi list, i found the source of my problem here. the patch was using the [arduino] abstraction. i had it located in the same path than my patch (version 0.3), but another one (version 0.4) is located in /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/extra/hardware/ i've always assumed that pd searches for abstractions first in the same directory than the patch is found. that doesn't seem to be the case. for some reason pd sometimes choose to prefer the 0.4 version which has a different, non working bitrate set. i've deleted the abstraction and use it now in a subpatch instead, so i am sure no other version is loaded instead. max Am 2008-06-13 um 18:54 schrieb Claude Heiland-Allen:Max Neupert wrote:this is the output when it does work:set_baudrate baudbits: 57600this is the output when it doesn't:set_baudrate baudbits: 115200anyone has a clue what's going on?I'm guessing the baudbits has something to do with it. Maybe something along the connection between pd and arduino doesn't support the higher speed. Never used arduino or any other serial devices though. Claude -- http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing listUNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
