On Nov 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> Actually, please remove that if you did check it in. That change to >> nqpoly4 is not backwards compatible and will likely cause patch >> breakage. Make a new objectclass if you want to add that feature. > > You're right, it will lead to double loadbangs. I didn't think of this > and will undo it. Thanks for that report. > >> About the loadbang support, AFAIK, the loadbang technique in polypoly >> will not work for abstractions that are used with the patches that >> are instantiated using polypoly. This initbang technique means all >> levels get proper loadbangs. > > All levels get proper loadbangs with the [loadbang(->[s pd-x] > technique > already, there's no need for initbang in that case at all.
Hmm, that does indeed work, according to the quick test I did. I am pretty sure I tested this in the project I am working on, and it didn't work then. I'll see if I can find that. .hc > > Ciao > -- > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- "Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls you." - Richard M. Stallman _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list