Ah, thanks for the explanation... Mike
On 11/26/08, Thomas Grill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 26.11.2008 um 09:20 schrieb Mike McGonagle: > > > > On 11/26/08, Thomas Grill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > hmmm, how about > > > > > > [inlet] > > > | > > > [t a b] > > > | / | \ > > > | [200] [300] [400] > > > | | | | > > > [pack 0 0 0 0] > > > | > > > [outlet] > > > > > > > > > It's a pity that pack is not settable... > > > > > > > If I understand you correctly on this, Thomas, if it were "settable", > > wouldn't each use of that [pack] reset the values that it would use > > for the defaults? I thought that was the whole point of the problem? > > > > i meant that if one could use a [set 0 200 300 400( message for pack, that > would be shorter than three individual default numbers 200,300,400. > gr~~~ > > -- Peace may sound simple—one beautiful word— but it requires everything we have, every quality, every strength, every dream, every high ideal. —Yehudi Menuhin (1916–1999), musician _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list