Steffen Juul wrote:
On 20/01/2009, at 22.13, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:could you try the binary at http://iem.at/~zmoelnig/GEM/Gem0.91.2_104.tgz(it seems to work here)works/loads. thanks! that was fast.
:-)
Then i have another problem but it's not new. it's with pix_data. when i query it for rgb values from a red part of a png image, i get (r=0,g=1,b=1) as the output (i also boost the contrast and round off). to gem-tracker item 2484105 I posted a link to an email in the (pd-list) archive that have a demo patch. i wonder if it's a user error?
no it's definitely a bug in Gem. i don't think i'll fix it for 0.91 thought. it ought to be fixed in 0.92. thanks for the linksone more thing: could someone test whether [pix_2grey] works with the new 10.4 build?
if so, i will _replace_ the OSX binary on the various sites with the new one (rather than do 0.91.3)
fgmasdr IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
