wow, this version is almost 2 time faster than the original.
i did not know that expr~ was so slow...
do you mind if use this version to replace mine?
thanks
Cyrille
Frank Barknecht a écrit :
Hallo,
cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote:
I think, currently it's probably a bit slower because of the sin(), but maybe
that could be put into a tabread~.
i think the sin object is doing a linear interpolation in a 512 point table.
(don't know how it is done in expr~, but expr~ is not used for rjlib because of
it's licence, right?)
Attached is an expr-less version of saw~ which from a quick glance at
the scope looks and sounds the same. It is vanilla in that it uses
[abs~] and [>~] which are part of 0.42 (and thus RjDj). On older Pd
versions you can use for example the purepd abstractions for both from
the SVN in abstractions/purepd
Ciao
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
