On 2010-03-24 17:08, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote: > > zmoelnig wrote: > >> PS: >> for what it is worth: i have forked mrpeach/net yesterday, with the aim > > > If you're going to do that, I think you should change their names, otherwise > confusion will reign.
the names are just perfect :-) on the long run, i hope to make them compatible with your original objects. at the same time i don't mind at all if improvements are backported. for now a fork just seemed the best way to allow more rapid development without having to think about legacy issues. for now things look rather promising: a [tcpserver] that merely reflects incoming data back to a client (currently a "netcat" instance) over a realy wire took about 1.4min to reflect 500MB of data, whereas the original objects took about 53.5min (no manual tuning with buffer sizes in any test) fmadrs IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
