Hi,
I've realised that when using vd~, even if you ensure the execution
order so that you can have a delay of less than one block, any delay
less than one _sample_ will result to a delay of one sample.
Why so?
I guess it is related to the 4-point interpolation, because in order to
compute the first point you need one extra point that is not available
at delay 0. However, I don't see how that completely explains a
one-sample delay: this only affects the very first sample of the delayed
signal, there's no reason to have the whole signal delayed one sample.
With tabread4~ for example, when you feed a value <1 you get the value
of sample 1 (i.e. the second sample) (which is not the correct behaviour
either, imho, but anyway it only affects the first sample), but for any
value >=1 you get the interpolated value with no delay...
What am I missing?
thanks
m.
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistise...@gmail.com
http://www.matteosistisette.com
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
