(sorry for the delay in replying: I missed your reply because it was
addressed only to the list not to me)
> Except the problem of time machines: When interpolating around
> a non-delayed
> signal, you are interpolating around the time "now" and so you
> would need
> at least one sample from the future, whhich hasn't happened yet.
>
D'oh!!! Of course, stupid me!!!
I was thinking about the one sample from the _past_ (which is nonsense)
instead of the one from the _future_
Thanks
m.
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistise...@gmail.com
http://www.matteosistisette.com
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
