It's nice to see the Pd community can agree upon such basic conventions. On Jun 4, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> On Jun 4, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > >> Patches can also introduce bugs. > > Right. Such as the first version of my fix. I could have submitted that to > the patch tracker as well. I don't think that you should rely on submission > to the patch tracker as a sign of quality at all, even if there's somewhat a > correlation. If you want quality, you ought to find it by other means. > >> The patch tracker is a tool for tracking bits of code. It has a useful >> forum interface for discussions on the topic, and allows people to see >> what's pending, what's accepted, rejected, etc. SVN/GIT does not do those >> things. > > Exactly. And then if I think about what would be different if the SVN was > replaced by a FTP, I'm led to believe that it wouldn't make much of a > difference : pure-data is not really "using" SVN. > > _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... > | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801 -------- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
