On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Bernardo Barros wrote:
2010/6/29 Frank Barknecht <f...@footils.org>:
In this view, Miller has the biggest balls of dem all. :)
Is there a legal reason for PD not be GPL? Maybe it has some code from
another project?
If any code that Pd took from other projects had any license more
restricted than SIBSD, Miller wouldn't be able to call Pd as under SIBSD
license as a whole, he'd have to state "except such and such". This mostly
happens for some pieces in the /extra/ folder, such as [expr], which is
GPL'ed.
But if you want to see something really scary in Pd, look at
d_fft_mayer.c. If you understand at all what's the license of this, let
alone who owns the code and whether the license is legally invalidated by
patents, please tell me now.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
