Asunto:
Re: [PD] problem with mixer project
De:
IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at>
Fecha:
Sat, 07 May 2011 11:33:03 +0200
Para:
pd-list@iem.at
Para:
pd-list@iem.at
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2011 08:45 PM, Fernando Gadea wrote:
Hi list!
If I move any slider in my controller to raise the volume of any
channel, it works perfectly well, but if I move the master level the
latency starts to get crazy and the resulting values come really slowly,
Pd is designed to have a constant latency.
so Pd's (and the system's) latency will never when moving a slider
(well, unless you control a delay with the slider or do some other
explicit latency fuddling, but that's a different story)
or maybe you are referring to GUI latency? e.g the slider starts to
visually respond very slowly (it seems like in CM-talk, "latency" mostly
refers to audio latency).
without having looked at your patch, a good chance is that you have
created some control feedback.
Reading my mail I realized that I did not explain it all: the latency
problem starts when the dac~ is computing audio. As you can see in the
mixer, when I rise the master volume audio computation starts, meanwhile
if I set master volume to zero it ends. It is while computing audio that
the latency problem exists, so I guess the control side is not the
problem (am I in the right logic?) Nevertheless I have done what I
believe is an extensive control check in my patch, before and after
finding that deleting the mixer channels the problem ended. After that I
did another control check on the mixer part of the patch and found no
control feedback (my checks are visual, following line after line, so,
as human, I might be wrong, but I cannot find my error if I did one).
It seems that the latency is present not only in GUI. I send the values
to a symbol in the main patch to see what I am doing, so I am preety
sure I also hear the audio consecuences with the same latency (the audio
rises just when the mixer volume rises, about a second after moving the
slider if dac~ is on).
Anyway, I will look for some other posibilities of control feedback.
Thank you for your advice
fgmasdrt
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk3FEc8ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvR1fQCdEGsRD4QqEaMLxhJpEr3MblTO
kpcAoPTP2Rf14/nCN+GI3IOhBTP9B4xV
=Oh4I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pd-list mailing list
Pd-list@iem.at
to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
