Le 2011-11-18 à 10:16:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
This is more like iemguts: properties of abstractions. Jonathan's
proposal includes that, but also global things. IMHO, iemguts is the
most Pd-ish because its a library of simple objects rather than a single
absattr mega-object with attributes (Max/MSP style) or messages via
send/receive.
Is the goal to make pd easier to use for complex problems, or is the goal
to create lots of tiny classes for the sake of ideology ?
I don't mind small classes and I do have problems with certain huge
classes being huge (in Max) and bundling lots of things that they could
outsource, but [absattr-sub] doesn't look like one.
Do you also think that [expr] should be avoided, for the sake of making
simple objects ? [expr] is a complex thing with complex syntax.
______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
