That is for sure a goal. For the bare minimum, there is always Pd-vanilla.
.hc On Feb 18, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Tuti wrote: > I just wish that PD keeps the same philosophy of robustness and > simplicity as before. > Tuti > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> wrote: >> >> >> It was already like that since the first version of pd ever, over 15 years >> ago. It's misleading to write it in the same paragraph as « the pd-gui side >> of Pd has been re-written from scratch ». You also don't state which part of >> the pd-gui has been rewritten from scratch, which obscures the fact that a >> large fraction of it hasn't been rewritten. >> >> It's a bad idea to take credit for things that Miller had already done or >> that his contributors had done. >> >> If you want to say, for example, that pd-extended 43 fixes a certain cause >> of hiccups due to bad sync between the two parts of pd, then you can say it >> like that, more or less, but a goal to keeping explanations simple doesn't >> entitle you to say what you have said. >> Le 2012-02-17 à 15:02:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit : >> >>> First off, the pd-gui side of Pd has been re-written from scratch. When >>> you run Pd, you are actually running two programs: pd is the core engine and >>> pd-gui is the GUI. Since basically all computers now come with multiple CPU >>> cores, this means that pd-gui will usually run on a separate CPU core than >>> pd, so they don’t step on each other’s toes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. - General Smedley Butler _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list