----- Original Message ----- > From: Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> > To: "pd-list@iem.at" <pd-list@iem.at> > Cc: > Sent: Friday, June 8, 2012 9:05 AM > Subject: Re: [PD] settable receive again (was: ipoke~ ?) > > On Don, 2012-06-07 at 15:43 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > >> >> What are the conceptual reasons? > > I don't know actually. I somehow thought, that the missing ability to > set the receive symbol in [r ] was intentional. And since I never saw an > urgent need for it, I never questioned my somewhat silly assumption. > However, it seems now this feature hasn't been added simply because of > the bug it would expose. > > Regarding your use case: I would do it like Cyrille proposed it in the > previous mail. Now, would that solve your problem or am I still totally > misunderstanding you? (Sorry if I do)
See my reply to him. It would solve my problem in the same way the hack to get args in Pd vanilla solves the arg-getting problem. That is to say, it requires more work from the user and is really only a partial solution. -Jonathan > > Roman > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
