Le 08/06/2012 19:15, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
anyway, if you really in need for a settable send and a settable receive, you
can always use prepends and route that are both settable.
see small attached abstraction.
I think you are stuck for two reasons
1) [r setable_send_receive] is global. I want the parent $0 in front of it so
that
my abstraction symbols don't clash with other abstractions.
i don't understand this point : just ignore the settable_send_receive stuff
that is hidden inside ss and sr.
this 2 abstractions work exactly like a real settable send and receive, at
least for the local / global send.
i.e. if you want a local only send/receive, just use $0-bla, like you would have done
with "real" send / receive.
that the route that filter content of different abstraction. the only problem
is CPU overload, but that should really be minor.
2) Your example filters messages in a way that s/r doesn't. It's possible to
hack
around this using three extra objects.
yes, right. but that is a minor problem. not a show stopper.
cheers
c
It is also possible to get the arguments of
an abstraction in Pd Vanilla. With the former, I'd rather send a single
message to
an inlet and be done.
-Jonathan
cheers
c
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
