On 06/12/12 14:57, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp
If I may suggest... I would try to observe and _listen_ to what the
patch produces, and then try to re-produce it not necessarily making an
exact copy, but your own personalised version which you think sounds
great :)
Ciao,
Lorenzo.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensi...@gmail.com
<mailto:itensi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What are you trying to accomplish?
On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adr...@gmail.com
<mailto:adr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a
signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it
scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So
[phasor~ 1]
|
[rate~ 1.5]
will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but
that won't do the trick with non-integers.
Any ideas?
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
