I disagree. Your example lists what? 2 more developers? I'm talking about 
"developers" as in people working the C code, build scripts, tcl/tk etc aka 
people who could, theoretically, help push out a new Pd-extended release. True, 
we have plenty of people working on externals, but this is a problem for 
someone who can go deeper.

I still maintain that the number of low level developers to overall users 
(non-developers) is relatively low.

On Sep 23, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote:

> However, your description of the user/developer ratio doesn't ring true to 
> me.  There's actually a surplus of developers and development energy-- I 
> count two implementations of presets in the last year or two (in Pd-l2ork and 
> the Chocolate et Coffee lib) which are in addition to however many already 
> exist on svn and the Pd forum.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com





_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to