On 2014-12-15 22:46, Miller Puckette wrote: > Just FYI…. Joe Deken of newblankets.org is considering making a repository > of external objects compatible with Pd vanilla. I think almost all the > objects in Pd extended will work with vanilla (and if I find out what > specific changes vanilla would need to allow the others, I'd be happy to > try to provide them). It seems like maintaining compiled versions of the > libs is an easier thing to do than maintaining all of Pd Extended.
I heard about that. It could neatly solve the distribution problem and make the corpus of pd-extended libraries more manageable by splitting it up. It there is a pilot-program, I would happy to be part of it. > > cheers > Miller Greetings, Fred Jan > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 07:36:59PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >>> I could put the compiled libraries somewhere online, >>> but do not expect a neat installer. >> >> No need for installers. If it's somewhere just compiled for the major >> systems and with the source code for nerds everywhere is cool ;) >> >>> There is no indication a new Extended release >>> will happen any time soon. >> >> I know, that's a bummer :( and that's why putting the library for download >> seems important. >> >>> the formula in the code is the same as found >>> in the Max5 documentation >> >> yeah, but does it show you how to calculate the coefficients besides the >> formula? >> >> cheers >> >> 2014-12-15 16:08 GMT-02:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkr...@xs4all.nl>: >>> >>> Hi Alexandre, >>>>> Sorry, yes pd-extended 0.44. >>>> >>>> sure, but when I first mentioned about versions, I was thinking about >>>> cyclone's own version number. >>>> >>>> I assume there's one, right? And I also assume you have it for download >>>> somewhere for people to include it in Pd Vanilla. Where can we get it? >>>> >>> Currently it appears only in the pd META sub-patch of the help-patches. It >>> is currently 0.1-alpha56. Adding it to each object would be a good thing >>> and report it at load time (Debug-level). But this would mean changing all >>> objects. Something for the todo list. >>> >>> Currently there are only some patches in the patch tracker, and linux 32 >>> bit executables on my harddisk. The idea is to test them on several >>> platforms, including linux 64 bit, Windows 32 bit and Macos X 10.7 (64 >>> bit). I could put the compiled libraries somewhere online, but do not >>> expect a neat installer. I would consider it a temporary stop-gap for >>> the time there is no proper distribution. >>> >>>> If Extended keeps on delaying too much for an update, I'm gonna start >>>> just getting all the libraries I use into vanilla :( >>> >>> There is no indication a new Extended release will happen any time soon. >>>> >>>> cheers >>>> >>>> ps. while we're at it, I have a question, are [lores~] and [reson~] >>>> perfect copies of the Max's objects, same formula and everything, or >>>> just something similar? >>> >>> The objects should be proper clones, but I haven't checked them in that >>> much detail. At first glance I would say, the formula in the code is the >>> same as found in the Max5 documentation. >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Fred Jan >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list