Well, you can peruse the tracker's open patches to get a sense of whether you
can (or if it's worth your time to try). Keep in mind the Pd-l2ork gui prefs
code started out as a patch specifically written as a clean, small patch to get
into Vanilla/Extended.
-Jonathan
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:04 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Sorry, I didn;t mean to sound like I'm griping. The nature of the question was
more "if we apply clean, small patches to vanilla, could we get some of Han's
updates in so they aren't lost to non Pd-l2ork users". I'm in the middle of
writing my thesis right now, but getting into real Pd development again is on
my list when I'm finally done with it.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 12/16/2014 03:12 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
I like how I explicitly asked to not hear that "Pd-l2ork has that" and yet
that's the response I got. I already knew this anyway from the sample
screenshots you were posting when you were implementing it. (Looks great BTW)
Yeah, I know, it was 100% willful snark on my part. It's kind of like you
were asking, "Is there a way to do X, while satisfying my irrational desire to
ignore a working solution by someone who likely already did X?"
Anyway, did you look at the code? It's done in tcl/tk, and it does not depend
on tkpath. So if you don't want to duplicate all the work I already did, you
can fairly easily port that back to Pd Vanilla. There might be a few API
differences in accessing the audio backend, but there are small and I don't
mind helping make those changes.
Also, I specifically did everything in tcl/tk so that the patch would be as
simple as possible. It shouldn't even require a recompile. Now, I haven't
looked at Ivica's changes that added persistence. But all versions of Pd have
the same prefs-saving code so that shouldn't be difficult, either.
Also, if you didn't know, why respond? :P
Because the answer to your question ultimately depends on whether what you
come up with fits the unspoken yet stringent HIG standards imposed by Miller's
Pd.
But that doesn't mean that code which does _exactly_ what you're asking about
isn't relevant to your question.
-Jonathan
On 12/15/2014 06:21 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
If that does become a real scenario, I hope we can find a way to bring some of
the Pd-extended UI changes into vanilla, such as the pixel perfect sizing
across platforms, an option for the extended coloring (graytones) etc. Before
anyone says “Pd-Lork has that”, I’m just wondering if it’s feasible to bring in
some of the work Hans did after the gui cleanup which is already in vanilla.
In answer to your question: I don't know.
Having answered that...
Pd-l2ork has gui theme presets for Vanilla, Inverted Vanilla, Pd-extended,
Commodore 64, Strongbad's Compy, and a few others. There's also an interface
to make a custom theme-- I didn't make it persistent but I think Ivica added
that ability.
-Jonathan
-- Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com
--
Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
