On 11/02/2016 09:57 PM, Richie Cyngler wrote: > I've had the same issue on RPi. I'm no backend Linux guy either but it > seems problematic for Pd's available current version to be tied to an OS > release.
why is this problematic? the entire point of a distribution (which is a more accurate term than "OS"), is to ensure that all the components play together *nicely*. this works suprisingly well, given that Debian/stable (the one with Pd-0.46) has about 57000 software packages, that *all* play together nicely. > Is there some way around this? it occurs to me, that i have posted one a number of times. anyhow, I'm planning to provide backports once Debian/stretch has been released. fgmrdsa IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
