Le 23/03/2017 à 09:24, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> On 2017-03-22 16:55, Jack wrote:
>> Le 22/03/2017 à 16:41, Christof Ressi a écrit :
>>> does it *really* have to be faster than 40ms? what are you trying to do? do 
>>> you *need* the output in 0 logical time? depending on the situation you 
>>> might want to spread the computation across multiple audio blocks or if you 
>>> don't care about determinism, have the file in another instance of pd and 
>>> communicate with netsend/netreceive (one instance makes a request and the 
>>> other instance sends the result once the search is finished). 
>>
>> Yes, i need 0 logical time, 
> 
> if you are mainly concerend about logical time, then everything is good:
> 0 logical time can take 200ms real time and more.

Sure.
But i would be more happy if this 0 logical time take 2 min instead of
10 min !
++

Jack


> 
> gmsdfrt
> IOhannes
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to